Tislelizumab Plus Platinum and Etoposide Versus Placebo Plus Platinum and Etoposide as First-Line Treatment for Extensive-Stage SCLC (RATIONALE-312): A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) prognosis remains poor. The phase 3 RATIONALE-312 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. METHODS: RATIONALE-312 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in the People's Republic of China. Eligible patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive four cycles of tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo, with etoposide plus carboplatin or cisplatin intravenously every 3 weeks, followed by tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo as maintenance. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety. RESULTS: Between July 22, 2019 and April 21, 2021, 457 patients were randomized to tislelizumab (n = 227) or placebo (n = 230), plus chemotherapy. Baseline demographics were generally balanced between arms. At the data cutoff (April 19, 2023), the median study follow-up was 14.2 months (interquartile range: 8.6-25.3). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited a statistically significant OS benefit versus placebo plus chemotherapy (stratified hazard ratio = 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.93]; one-sided p = 0.0040; median: 15.5 [95% CI: 13.5-17.1] versus 13.5 mo [95% CI: 12.1-14.9], respectively). Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the tislelizumab versus placebo arm (stratified hazard ratio = 0.64 [95% CI: 0.52-0.78]; p < 0.0001; median: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.3-5.5] versus 4.3 mo [95% CI: 4.2-4.4], respectively). Grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 86% of patients in each treatment arm and were mostly hematologic. CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited statistically significant clinical benefit and manageable safety compared with placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ES-SCLC.

Quantification of preexisting lung ground glass opacities on CT for predicting checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to life-threatening pneumonitis, and pre-existing interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are a risk factor for checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). However, the subjective assessment of ILA and the lack of standardized methods restrict its clinical utility as a predictive factor. This study aims to identify non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at high risk of CIP using quantitative imaging. METHODS: This cohort study involved 206 cases in the training set and 111 cases in the validation set. It included locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent ICI therapy. A deep learning algorithm labeled the interstitial lesions and computed their volume. Two predictive models were developed to predict the probability of grade ≥ 2 CIP or severe CIP (grade ≥ 3). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyze predictors of progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In a training cohort of 206 patients, 21.4% experienced CIP. Two models were developed to predict the probability of CIP based on different predictors. Model 1 utilized age, histology, and preexisting ground glass opacity (GGO) percentage of the whole lung to predict grade ≥ 2 CIP, while Model 2 used histology and GGO percentage in the right lower lung to predict grade ≥ 3 CIP. These models were validated, and their accuracy was assessed. In another exploratory analysis, the presence of GGOs involving more than one lobe on pretreatment CT scans was identified as a risk factor for progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of GGO volume and distribution on pre-treatment CT scans could assist in monitoring and manage the risk of CIP in NSCLC patients receiving ICI therapy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study's quantitative imaging and computational analysis can help identify NSCLC patients at high risk of CIP, allowing for better risk management and potentially improved outcomes in those receivingICI treatment.

Myeloprotection with trilaciclib in Chinese patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study (TRACES).

INTRODUCTION: Trilaciclib is a transient cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor that decreases the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). TRACES study was designed to assess the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK) of trilaciclib before chemotherapy in Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. METHODS: The study included an open-label safety run-in part (Part 1) and double-blinded, placebo-controlled part (Part 2) where patients received trilaciclib or placebo before chemotherapy. Treatment-naïve or previously treated ES-SCLC patients received intravenous trilaciclib (240 mg/m2) or placebo before etoposide/carboplatin or topotecan, respectively. Primary endpoints were PK, safety and duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1 in Part 1 and Part 2. Exploratory endpoints included the effect of trilaciclib on other myeloprotection endpoints, safety and antitumor efficacy. RESULTS: Overall, 95 Chinese patients were enrolled, of which 12 and 83 patients were in Part 1 and Part 2, respectively. In Part 1, trilaciclib was well tolerated. Non-compartmental analysis results revealed no substantial differences in the main exposure parameters. In Part 2, 41 patients received trilaciclib, and 42 received placebo. Patients in trilaciclib arm vs placebo arm had a clinically and statistically significant decrease in DSN (mean [SD]) in Cycle 1 (0 [1.7] vs 2 [3.0] days; P = 0.0003), with improvements in additional neutrophil, red blood cell, and platelet measures. After a median follow-up of 14.1 months, the median overall survival was 12.0 months in trilaciclib arm and 8.8 months in placebo arm (HR, 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.40-1.22). Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months and 4.3 months, respectively (HR, 0.86; 95 % CI: 0.53-1.39). Trilaciclib had a well-tolerated safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Trilaciclib in the Chinese population demonstrated a similar PK and safety profile as seen in other global trials. There was significant reduction of DSN in Cycle 1, thereby substantiating the myeloprotective effects of trilaciclib in Chinese ES-SCLC patients.

Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a promising therapeutic strategy. The situation for ICI rechallenge can be divided into three categories: adverse events (AEs); resistance to ICIs, and rechallenge becomes compulsive because of tumor relapse while the patients had completed a 2 year course of immunotherapy. However, these categories are still controversial and should be explored further. Through voting at the 6th Straits Summit Forum on Lung Cancer, in this study we summarize the consensus of 147 experts in ICI rechallenges. A total of 97.74% experts agreed to rechallenge; 48.87% experts rechallenge with the original drug, and the others rechallenge with a different drug; 40.3% agreed to rechallenge directly after progression; 88.06% experts agreed to ICI rechallenge with a combination regimen; and factors such as previous performance status score, PD-1 expression, and age should also be considered. Understanding the the clinical studies in ICI rechallenge could bring us one step closer to understanding the consensus. In patients with advanced NSCLC who have suffered recurrent or distant metastasis after immunotherapy, the option of rechallenge with ICIs is a promising treatment option.

Comprehensive analysis the prognostic and immune characteristics of mitochondrial transport-related gene SFXN1 in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondria, which serve as the fundamental organelle for cellular energy and metabolism, are closely linked to the growth and survival of cancer cells. This study aims to identify and assess Sideroflexin1 (SFXN1), an unprecedented mitochondrial gene, as a potential prognostic biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). METHODS: The mRNA and protein levels of SFXN1 were investigated based on the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD dataset, and then validated by real-time quantitative PCR, Western Blotting and immunohistochemistry from our clinical samples. The clinical correlation and prognostic value were evaluated by the TCGA cohort and verified via our clinical dataset (n = 90). The somatic mutation, drug sensitivity data, immune cell infiltration and single-cell RNA sequencing data of SFXN1 were analyzed through public databases. RESULTS: SFXN1 was markedly upregulated at both mRNA and protein levels in LUAD, and high expression of SFXN1 were correlated with larger tumor size, positive lymph node metastasis, and advanced clinical stage. Furthermore, SFXN1 upregulation was significantly associated with poor clinical prognosis. SFXN1 co-expressed genes were also analyzed, which were mainly involved in the cell cycle, central carbon metabolism, DNA repair, and the HIF-1α signaling pathway. Additionally, SFXN1 expression correlated with the expression of multiple immunomodulators, which act to regulate the tumor immune microenvironment. Results also demonstrated an association between SFXN1 expression and increased immune cell infiltration, such as activated CD8 + T cells, natural killer cells (NKs), activated dendritic cells (DCs), and macrophages. LUAD patients with high SFXN1 expression exhibited heightened sensitivity to multiple chemotherapies and targeted drugs and predicted a poor response to immunotherapy. SFXN1 represented an independent prognostic marker for LUAD patients with an improved prognostic value for overall survival when combined with clinical stage information. CONCLUSIONS: SFXN1 is frequently upregulated in LUAD and has a significant impact on the tumor immune environment. Our study uncovers the potential of SFXN1 as a prognostic biomarker and as a novel target for intervention in LUAD.

Baseline C-reactive protein predicts efficacy of the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter study.

AIMS: To investigate the predictive value of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on the efficacy of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study spanning from January 2016 to December 2020, advanced LSCC patients initially treated with chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy and ICI were categorized into normal and elevated CRP subgroups. The relationship between CRP levels and treatment outcomes was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and multivariate logistic regression, focusing primarily on the progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint, and secondarily on overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) endpoints. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the log-rank test used for comparison between groups. RESULTS: Of the 245 patients evaluated, the 105 who received a combination of chemotherapy and ICI with elevated baseline CRP levels exhibited a significant reduction in PFS (median 6.5 months vs. 11.8 months, HR, 1.78; 95% CI: 1.12-2.81; p = 0.013) compared to those with normal CRP levels. Elevated CRP was identified as an independent risk factor for poor PFS through multivariate-adjusted analysis. However, among the 140 patients receiving chemotherapy alone, baseline CRP levels did not significantly influence PFS. Furthermore, within the combination therapy group, there was a notable decrease in the ORR (51% vs. 71%, p = 0.035), coupled with a significantly shorter OS (median 20.9 months vs. 31.5 months, HR, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.13-4.44; p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced LSCC, elevated baseline CRP levels were identified as an independent predictive factor for the efficacy of combination therapy with chemotherapy and ICI, but not in chemotherapy alone. This suggests that CRP may be a valuable biomarker for guiding treatment strategies.

Clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade) have revolutionized the treatment landscape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary resistance to immunotherapy (IO), which poses a substantial challenge in clinical settings, occurs in several initial responders. Currently, new treatment approaches have been extensively evaluated in investigational studies for these patients to tackle this difficult problem; however, the lack of consistency in clinical definition, uniform criteria for enrollment in clinical trials, and interpretation of results remain significant hurdles to progress. Thus, our expert panel comprehensively synthesized data from current studies to propose a practical clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in NSCLC in metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. In addition to patients who received IO alone (including IO-IO combinations), we also generated a definition for patients treated with chemotherapy plus IO. This consensus aimed to provide guidance for clinical trial design and facilitate future discussions with investigators. It should be noted that additional updates in this consensus are required when new data is available.

Patient-reported outcomes following selpercatinib treatment in Chinese patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer and thyroid cancer, and RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer in the phase II LIBRETTO-321 trial.

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly becoming an important part of clinical trials as they are helpful in analyzing the safety and efficacy of treatment in chronic diseases like cancer. Objectives: We report PROs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with selpercatinib treatment among Chinese patients with rearranged in transfection (RET) fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer (TC), and RET-mutant medullary TC (MTC) as an exploratory analysis of the LIBRETTO-321 trial. Design: A total of 77 patients (47 RET fusion-positive NSCLC, 1 RET fusion-positive TC, and 29 RET-mutant MTC) were enrolled. Compliance for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) was 100% at baseline and >90% at each time point. Methods: PROs were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, and a bowel diary assessment for MTC patients with baseline diarrhea using the Systemic Therapy-Induced Diarrhea Assessment Tool. Data were collected at pre-dose; every 8 weeks from cycle 3; and every 12 weeks after cycle 13. A >10-point change from baseline was considered clinically meaningful. PRO changes were summarized through cycle 13. Results: Most patients with NSCLC or MTC showed improvement or remained stable on the global health status and functional subscales. For global health status, 47.4% of NSCLC and MTC patients showed definite improvement with only 19.7% showing definite worsening. For functional subscales, less than 30% of the patients showed definite worsening. For symptom subscales, more than 64% of the patients either improved or remained stable for the symptoms. For MTC patients with bowel diary assessment (n = 5), there was no severity or worsening from baseline in the diarrheal episodes observed during treatment with selpercatinib. Conclusion: The study demonstrated favorable PROs in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC, TC, and RET-mutant MTC treated with selpercatinib. HRQoL was improved or stable as assessed by EORTC QLQ-30. Trail registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04280081) ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04280081.

Anlotinib plus icotinib as a potential treatment option for EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with concurrent mutations: final analysis of the prospective phase 2, multicenter ALTER-L004 study.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and concurrent mutations have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to examine anlotinib plus icotinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutation with or without concurrent mutations. METHODS: This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03736837) was performed at five hospitals in China from December 2018 to November 2020. Non-squamous NSCLC cases with EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with anlotinib and icotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty participants were enrolled, including 31 (52%) and 29 (48%) with concurrent mutations and pathogenic concurrent mutations, respectively. The median follow-up was 26.9 (range, 15.0-38.9) months. ORR and DCR were 68.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 15.1 (95%CI: 12.6-17.6) months which met the primary endpoint, median DoR was 13.5 (95%CI: 10.0-17.1) months, and median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 25.5-34.5) months. Median PFS and OS in patients with pathogenic concurrent mutations were 15.6 (95%CI: 12.5-18.7) months and not reached (95%CI: 17.46 months to not reached), respectively. All patients experienced TRAEs, including 26 (43%) and 1 (1.7%) who had grade ≥ 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib combined with icotinib was effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment option for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with or without concurrent mutations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03736837.

The effects of tislelizumab treatment on the health-related quality of life of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

This study examined the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tislelizumab versus docetaxel in the open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 trial called RATIONALE-303 (NCT03358875). HRQoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, and the EQ-5D-5L instruments. A longitudinal analysis of covariance assessed the change from baseline to Week 12 and from baseline to Week 18. A time to deterioration analysis was also performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Eight hundred and five patients were randomized to either tislelizumab (n = 535) or docetaxel, respectively (535 and 270 to tislelizumab and docetaxel, respectively). The tislelizumab arm improved while the docetaxel arm worsened in the QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL scale score (difference LS mean change Week 18: 5.7 [95% CI: 2.38, 9.07, p = 0.0008]), fatigue (Week 12: -3.2 [95% CI: -5.95, -0.37, p < 0.0266]; Week 18: -4.9 [95% CI: -8.26, -1.61, p = 0.0037]), and QLQ-LC13 symptom index score (Week 12: -5.5 [95% CI: -6.93, -4.04, P < 0.0001]; Week 18: -6.6 [95% CI: -8.25, -4.95, p < 0.0001]). The tislelizumab arm had improvements in coughing versus the docetaxel arm (Week 12: -4.7 [95% CI: -8.57, -0.78, p = 0.0188]; Week 18: -8.3 [95% CI: -13.02, -3.51, p = 0.0007]). The patients who received tislelizumab were less at risk for clinically meaningful worsening in the overall lung cancer symptom index scale (hazard ratio (HR): 0.24 [95% CI: 0.162, 0.356], p < 0.0001), dyspnea (HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.567, 0.958], p = 0.0109), coughing (HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.534, 1.019], p = 0.0309), and peripheral neuropathy (HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.370, 0.810] p = 0.0011). In general, tislelizumab versus docetaxel was associated with improved HRQoL and symptoms of lung cancer in patients who previously failed treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.

First-line atezolizumab monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen (IPSOS): a phase 3, global, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Despite immunotherapy advancements for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pivotal first-line trials were limited to patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and a median age of 65 years or younger. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line atezolizumab monotherapy with single-agent chemotherapy in patients ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: This trial was a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled study conducted at 91 sites in 23 countries across Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV NSCLC in whom platinum-doublet chemotherapy was deemed unsuitable by the investigator due to an ECOG PS 2 or 3, or alternatively, being 70 years or older with an ECOG PS 0-1 with substantial comorbidities or contraindications for platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Patients were randomised 2:1 by permuted-block randomisation (block size of six) to receive 1200 mg of atezolizumab given intravenously every 3 weeks or single-agent chemotherapy (vinorelbine [oral or intravenous] or gemcitabine [intravenous]; dosing per local label) at 3-weekly or 4-weekly cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were conducted in the safety-evaluable population, which included all randomised patients who received any amount of atezolizumab or chemotherapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03191786. FINDINGS: Between Sept 11, 2017, and Sept 23, 2019, 453 patients were enrolled and randomised to receive atezolizumab (n=302) or chemotherapy (n=151). Atezolizumab improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy (median overall survival 10·3 months [95% CI 9·4-11·9] vs 9·2 months [5·9-11·2]; stratified hazard ratio 0·78 [0·63-0·97], p=0·028), with a 2-year survival rate of 24% (95% CI 19·3-29·4) with atezolizumab compared with 12% (6·7-18·0) with chemotherapy. Compared with chemotherapy, atezolizumab was associated with stabilisation or improvement of patient-reported health-related quality-of-life functioning scales and symptoms and fewer grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (49 [16%] of 300 vs 49 [33%] of 147) and treatment-related deaths (three [1%] vs four [3%]). INTERPRETATION: First-line treatment with atezolizumab monotherapy was associated with improved overall survival, a doubling of the 2-year survival rate, maintenance of quality of life, and a favourable safety profile compared with single-agent chemotherapy. These data support atezolizumab monotherapy as a potential first-line treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech Inc, a member of the Roche group.

Selpercatinib monotherapy in a Chinese patient with RET fusion/ EGFR co-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer from the Phase II LIBRETTO-321 study: a case report.

Rearranged during transfection ( RET ) fusions and epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutations are potent oncogenic drivers in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but rarely co-exist. Concurrent RET/EGFR mutations have been reported in patients with NSCLC who develop resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors but are even less frequent in treatment-naïve patients. Consequently, there is no standard treatment for RET/EGFR -mutated NSCLC. We report a case of RET/EGFR mutant NSCLC successfully treated with the oral, potent, highly selective RET inhibitor selpercatinib (160 mg daily for 28-day cycles) in an ongoing phase II study in Chinese patients with NSCLC (LIBRETTO-321). The patient, a female nonsmoker, was diagnosed with de-novo left lung adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, and a RET fusion was detected by next-generation sequencing testing. The patient had two tumors in the pleura, a third in the subcarinal lymph node, and a nontarget tumor in the pleura. Pleural biopsy analysis confirmed a RET fusion KIF5B (K15;R12) and an EGFR exon 19 deletion. The patient achieved a partial response (PR) with selpercatinib (absence of target tumors in pleura and reduction in the size of lymph node tumor). The PR persisted for 14.7 months, with disease progression in the nontarget lesion in the pleura and a new lesion in the liver (the PR had persisted), resulting in the discontinuation of selpercatinib. The only notable adverse event was grade 3 elevated transaminase, that was effectively managed by dose reduction. These data may support the use of selpercatinib in patients with RET/EGFR co-mutated NSCLC.

Intracranial Activity of Selpercatinib in Chinese Patients With Advanced RET Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Phase II LIBRETTO-321 Trial.

PURPOSE: Selpercatinib, a highly selective, potent RET inhibitor with CNS activity, demonstrated sustained antitumor responses and intracranial activity in patients with RET-altered advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the global LIBRETTO-001 and Chinese LIBRETTO-321 trials. We report a prospective case series based on updated data from patients with brain metastases at baseline in LIBRETTO-321. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis with a centrally confirmed KIF5B/CCDC6/NCOA4-RET fusion. Patients with previously treated or untreated CNS metastases were included if asymptomatic or neurologically stable. Patients received oral selpercatinib 160 mg, twice daily, until progression. Objective systemic and intracranial response was independently assessed per RECIST v1.1. The data cutoff (DCO) was March 31, 2022. RESULTS: In total, 8/26 (31%) patients were included: 1/8 (13%) had previous brain surgery but no previous systemic therapy and 3/8 (38%) had received brain radiotherapy. Best overall systemic response was partial response (PR) in 6/8 patients (75%) and stable disease (SD) in 2/8 (25%). Among patients with measurable baseline CNS lesions, 4/5 (80%) achieved a confirmed intracranial response (3/5 PRs and 1/5 complete response [CR]). The best overall intracranial response was CR in 3/8 (38%), PR in 3/8 (38%), and SD in 1/8 (13%) and nonprogressive disease/non-CR in 1/8 (13%); 2/8 patients (25%) had CNS-only disease progression. The duration of treatment was 2.8-24.0 months, and 5/8 patients (63%) had treatment ongoing at DCO. Of 8 patients, 5 (63%) had grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) requiring dose modification. There were no treatment discontinuations because of TRAEs. CONCLUSION: Selpercatinib demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable intracranial activity in Chinese patients with brain metastases from RET-altered NSCLC, consistent with the global LIBRETTO-001 trial.

bITH, a blood-based metric of intratumor heterogeneity, is associated with clinical response to immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) has been associated with poor prognosis in advanced non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. However, there is currently no evidence supporting an ITH metric as a predictor of clinical benefit from ICB. The unique advantages of blood make it a promising material for ITH estimation and relevant applications. This study aims to develop and validate a blood-based ITH index for predicting ICB response. METHODS: NSCLC patients from the OAK and POPLAR clinical trials were used as the training cohorts for algorithm development. Survival analyses with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as endpoints were performed to assess clinical response. The predictive value of bITH was subsequently validated with an independent cohort of 42 NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade. FINDINGS: bITH was significantly associated with the differential OS and PFS elicited by atezolizumab vs. docetaxel in both univariable and multivariable analyses in the OAK patients, suggesting bITH as an independent predictor for response to ICB. Moreover, compared with blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB), bITH enabled greater OS segregation and comparable PFS segregation, and obtained a predictive role regardless of bTMB status. Moreover, the association between bITH and PFS was validated with an independent cohort. INTERPRETATION: Patients with low blood-based ITH metric manifest significant OS and PFS benefit from immunotherapy versus chemotherapy. Future research is awaited to corroborate our findings and to enrich the clinical utility of ITH. FUNDING: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81972718 and 81572321), the Natural Scientific Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (No. LY19H160007), the Science and Technology Program for Health and Medicine in Zhejiang Province, China (No. 2021KY541), the Scientific Research Project, Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (No. 21YYJC1616), the Scientific Research Project, Sichuan Medical Association (No. S20002), Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (No. 320.6750), and 2018 Entrepreneurial Leading Talent of Guangzhou Huangpu District and Guangzhou Development District (No. 2022-L023).

Gumarontinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping mutations: a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial.

Background: Approximately 3-4% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations. We report primary results from the phase 2 stage of a phase 1b/2 study of gumarontinib, a selective, potent, oral MET inhibitor, in patients with METex14 skipping mutation-positive (METex14-positive) NSCLC. Methods: The single-arm, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 stage of the GLORY study was conducted at 42 centres across China and Japan. Adults with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC received oral gumarontinib 300 mg once daily in continuous 21-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Eligible patients had failed one or two prior lines of therapy (not including a MET inhibitor), were ineligible for/refused chemotherapy, and had no genetic alterations targetable with standard therapies. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in patients with a valid baseline tumour assessment, by blinded independent review. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04270591). Findings: Between Aug 2, 2019 and Apr 28, 2021, 84 patients were enrolled and received gumarontinib (median follow-up 13.5 months [IQR 8.7-17.1]), at data cut-off (Apr 28, 2022) five patients whose METex14 status could not be confirmed by a central laboratory were excluded from the efficacy analysis. The objective response rate was 66% (95% CI 54-76) overall (n = 79), 71% (95% CI 55-83) in treatment-naïve patients (n = 44), and 60% (95% CI 42-76) in previously-treated patients (n = 35). The most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) were oedema (67/84 patients, 80%) and hypoalbuminuria (32/84, 38%). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 45 (54%) patients. Treatment-related adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation occurred in 8% (7/84) of patients. Interpretation: Gumarontinib monotherapy had durable antitumour activity with manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC when used in first line or later. Funding: Haihe Biopharma Co., Ltd. Supported in part by grants from the National Science and Technology Major Project of China for "Clinical Research of Gumarontinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor" (2018ZX09711002-011-003); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030045 to S.L. and 82172633 to YF.Y); Shanghai Municipal Science & Technology Commission Research Project (19411950500 to S.L.); Shanghai Shenkang Action Plan (16CR3005A to S.L.) and Shanghai Chest Hospital Project of Collaborative Innovation (YJXT20190105 to S.L.).

Bevacizumab/PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitor or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively collected data for patients with advanced nsNSCLC who underwent first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitor or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (IC and BC groups). Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to balance covariates. Results: 278 patients were enrolled, after PSM (n = 104/group), the objective response rate was 45.1% and 24.0% in the IC and BC groups (p = 0.001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.5 and 8.2 months (p = 0.007), and duration of response was 14.8 versus 8.1 months (p = 0.007), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the PFS for those patients with PD-L1≥1% (16.2 vs 6.8 months, p = 0.000) was significantly longer in the IC group than that in BC group, but not in the PD-L1<1% subgroup (8.9 vs12.7 months, p = 0.719). Conclusion: PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy was superior to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced nsNSCLC, which is debatable for patients with PD-L1<1%.

Prognostic and immunological characteristics of CDK1 in lung adenocarcinoma: A systematic analysis.

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) play a key role in cell proliferation in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Comprehensive analysis of CDKs to elucidate their clinical significance and interactions with the tumor immune microenvironment is needed. Methods: RNA expression, somatic mutation, copy number variation, and single-cell RNA sequencing data were downloaded from public datasets. First, we comprehensively evaluated the expression profile and prognostic characteristics of 26 CDKs in LUAD, and CDK1 was selected as a candidate for further analysis. Then, a systematic analysis was performed to explore the relationships of CDK1 with clinical characteristics and tumor immune microenvironment factors in LUAD. Results: CDK1 was markedly upregulated at both the mRNA and protein level in LUAD. Moreover, overexpression of CDK1 was related to poor clinical outcomes. CDK1 coexpressed genes were mainly involved in the cell cycle, the DNA repair process, and the p53 signaling pathway. In addition, CDK1 expression was found to be correlated with the expression of multiple immunomodulators and chemokines, which participate in activating and suppressing the immune microenvironment. CDK1 expression was also correlated with increased infiltration of numerous immune cells, including CD4+ T cells and M1 macrophages. Patients with high CDK1 expression tended to have a poor response to immunotherapy but were sensitive to multiple chemotherapies and targeted drugs. The MDK-NCL and SPP1-CD44 ligand-receptor pairs were markedly activated in the intercellular communication network. CDK1 was an independent prognostic factor for LUAD and improved the ability to predict overall survival when combined with tumor stage. Conclusion: CDK1 plays an essential role in reshaping the tumor immune microenvironment and might be a prognostic and treatment biomarker in LUAD.

SAFFRON-103: a phase 1b study of the safety and efficacy of sitravatinib combined with tislelizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond poorly to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatments. Combination with other agents may improve the outcomes. This open-label, multicenter, phase 1b trial investigated the combination of sitravatinib, a spectrum-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, plus anti-PD-1 antibody tislelizumab. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC were enrolled (Cohorts A, B, F, H, and I; N=22-24 per cohort). Cohorts A and F included patients previously treated with systemic therapy, with anti-PD-(L)1-resistant/refractory non-squamous (cohort A) or squamous (cohort F) disease. Cohort B included patients previously treated with systemic therapy, with anti-PD-(L)1-naïve non-squamous disease. Cohorts H and I included patients without prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease, no prior anti-PD-(L)1/immunotherapy, with PD-L1-positive non-squamous (cohort H) or squamous (cohort I) histology. Patients received sitravatinib 120 mg orally one time per day plus tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks, until study withdrawal, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability among all treated patients (N=122). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed tumor responses and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.9 months (range: 0.4-30.6). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 98.4% of the patients, with ≥Grade 3 TRAEs in 51.6%. TRAEs led to discontinuation of either drug in 23.0% of the patients. Overall response rate was 8.7% (n/N: 2/23; 95% CI: 1.1% to 28.0%), 18.2% (4/22; 95% CI: 5.2% to 40.3%), 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI: 8.2% to 47.2%), 57.1% (12/21; 95% CI: 34.0% to 78.2%), and 30.4% (7/23; 95% CI: 13.2% to 52.9%) in cohorts A, F, B, H, and I, respectively. Median duration of response was not reached in cohort A and ranged from 6.9 to 17.9 months across other cohorts. Disease control was achieved in 78.3-90.9% of the patients. Median PFS ranged from 4.2 (cohort A) to 11.1 months (cohort H). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, sitravatinib plus tislelizumab was tolerable for most patients, with no new safety signals and overall safety profiles consistent with known profiles of these agents. Objective responses were observed in all cohorts, including in patients naïve to systemic and anti-PD-(L)1 treatments, or with anti-PD-(L)1 resistant/refractory disease. Results support further investigation in selected NSCLC populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03666143.

Tislelizumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC (RATIONALE-303): A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The phase 3 RATIONALE-303 trial (NCT03358875) investigated the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab versus docetaxel in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. Here, we report the efficacy and safety results and describe the exploratory biomarker analyses. METHODS: A total of 805 patients aged more than or equal to 18 years with locally advanced or metastatic squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized 2:1 to intravenous tislelizumab 200 mg or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor cell expression greater than or equal to 25% populations. The exploratory biomarker analyses included PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, and gene expression profile. RESULTS: At the prespecified interim analysis (August 10, 2020), the co-primary end point of OS in the ITT population was met, with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS with tislelizumab versus docetaxel (median 17.2 versus 11.9 mo, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64, p < 0.0001). At the final analysis (July 15, 2021), the other co-primary end point of OS in the PD-L1 tumor cell greater than or equal to 25% population was further met (median 19.3 versus 11.5 mo, respectively; HR = 0.53, p < 0.0001), and OS continued to improve in the ITT population (median 16.9 versus 11.9 mo, respectively, HR = 0.66). Exploratory biomarker analyses revealed the potential association of NOTCH1-4 mutations with improved tislelizumab efficacy for both OS and progression-free survival, whereas tissue tumor mutation burden correlated with progression-free survival benefit, but not OS benefit. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab was found to have a significantly improved and long-term clinical benefit in OS versus docetaxel in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression.